Sorry for the delayed update but I’ve been having problems with the computer I’m using. Before I reveal this week’s movie, I’d like to describe my reaction to it. I liked it and I disliked it. I found it twee and affectated. I liked the characters and was interested by the ideas the movie offered. So it’s kind of a mess but in a good way. I’m referring to 2012’s Cabin in the Woods.
There’s a huge elephant in the room. The movie features a twist, kind of, that’s also omnipresent. What I mean is that things aren’t what they seem in this movie and while the movie is up front about this, it’s not until the end when the reason for the whole situation is revealed. So now my dilemma is, do I tell everything that happens? I mean, the movie’s been out for a year. Get with it! But, it’s only been out for a year! So I’m going to dance around the subject and not refer directly to what’s going on. I’d avoid the comments if you want things to remain unspoiled because I’m sure the commentators have seen the movie.
Spoilers(ish) Below . . .
Ok. The movie follows a group of five college students looking to get away to the eponymous cabin in the woods. Dana (Kristen Connolly) is the Final Girl, Curt (Chris Hemsworth) is the brain, Jules (Anna Hutchison) is the beauty, Marty (Fran Kranz) is the stoner, and Holden (Jesse Williams) is the new guy.
It becomes clear from the beginning that something is weird. People from a vague bureaucracy are deeply interested in the outcome of this trip and may be manipulating what happens. Still, they pass the obligatory threatening hillbilly and find that the cabin is like every horror movie cabin. Awful.
In the basement, they find the creepiest treasure trove ever. It’s like eleventy horror movies collided with creepy dolls, old necklaces, puzzle boxes, and an old diary. Dana recites the Latin in the diary, after Marty dares everyone to go back upstairs, and BOOM. It’s an invasion by a zombie redneck torture family. So that’s it, right? No, because there’s still the fate of that weird bureaucracy. What do they want and what do they have to do with this?
That’s pretty much all I can say without giving everything away.
The movie was written by Joss Whedon and Drew Goddard, directed by Drew Goddard, and produced by Joss Whedon. I’m–I don’t want to say a fan, because I think he’s a smug bastard but I respect his work–familiar with Joss Whedon since I love Buffy the Vampire Slayer. I looked Drew Goddard up and saw that he wrote the two episodes of season seven Buffy that I like, “Lies my Parents Told me” and “Conversations with Dead People.” So we’re on solid, if supercilious, ground. The intent of the movie was to make a statement on slasher films. Scream it ain’t and I feel so passionately about this that I used the word “ain’t.” But it’s still fun. It definitely subverts the genre in its own way.
I personally like the aforementioned nod to the creepy warning hillbilly that’s in about 75% of slasher films. There’s also one moment in the cabin when Curt says that they should stick together. Then, within thirty seconds he changes his mind and says “We should split up.” I love that moment and I love Marty’s reaction even more. I also love references to Deadites and Evil Molesting Trees, if you have a sharp eye.
But then the movie goes and basically reinforces the genre. The main issue that is the sticking point for me is referring to Jules’ character as “the whore.” Without giving up too much (This is such a difficult entry to write), I get that they were trying to stick to certain archetypes, like the Fool, the Scholar, the Virgin, etc. I just really hate the conflating of a sexually active woman with a whore because the two terms aren’t interchangeable. Also, this may sound like I’m contradicting myself based on my sexually active=/=whore argument, but I hate that we live in a society where whore is an insult instead of a profession. Being a whore should be a job, it should be safe, and it should be sane (I mean, entered to of your own free will and in a state of good mental health as opposed to acting out past issues.) We live in a society where women are punished for their sexuality and elected officials spend time debating what’s legitimate rape. I can deal with this being reflected in the genre that I love and I can even celebrate some well-made movies that deal with the issue but seeing a self-described feminist like Joss Whedon repeat the tired canard but then act like he’s making some big statement about the genre is more than I can stomach. How about killing the virgin but letting the “whore” live? And Jules is killed just before she’s about to have sex with Curt. That’s a pretty strong statement.
Clearly. I have issues with Joss Whedon. He reminds me of the guy that shows up in every women’s studies class and says, “I think I’m a feminist but…” and then comes out with the most offensive shit ever. This is the guy that once said, “I don’t give fans what they want, I give them what they need.” Hey, maybe instead of reenacting your daddy issues, why don’t you stop and listen to women instead of telling them what they want?
Ugh, this entry is coming out so much more bitter than I mean it to. The movie is good, ok? But it’s not perfect. Fine but flawed, I guess would be how to describe it. For fan’s of Whedon’s other work, there are definitely callbacks. I haven’t watched Firefly yet but I can sure point out the Buffy-isms. This mysterious bureaucracy monitoring the cabin resembles The Initiative from season four. Also, in a scene with many monsters, look out for what looks like Glory’s snake demon and Xander’s evil clown.
Despite the way this post sounded, I actually enjoyed this movie. I liked the characters and was sad to see them die. Compare this with the jerks from Cabin Fever. I really liked the direction the story took and thought that it was a fun movie to watch. So there, I guess. Keep an eye out for Sigourney Weaver!
- Scarina--the authoress and editrix of this site. I like scary movies and have dedicated my free time to cataloging horror--the good, the bad, and the ugly. Sometimes there are books too.
There's film criticism, literary criticism, and humor here. I can be highbrow but there's lots of pop culture too. And feminism.
I fervently love "Twin Peaks" and wish it were a real place so I could move there. I can't list my favorite scary movies because they change depending on my mood, the season, and how much coffee I've had.
I'm an artist looking for ways to blend creepy with cute. I try to channel my childhood nightmares, my love of horror, and my experiences with sleepy paralysis.
Reach out and touch someoneNeed to get in touch with me? Here's my email address. firstname.lastname@example.org
You Have Questions?
Last Week in the Scary Vault of Scariness
From the Crypt
- 21st century
- 50 chilling classics
- body horror
- celebrity deaths
- double feature
- famous movie monsters
- film club
- halloween 2010
- halloween 2011
- halloween 2012
- halloween 2013
- halloween 2016
- haunted houses
- horror-writers dot net
- killer kids
- outer space
- serial killers
- short film
- slashermas 2013
- terrible toys
- things involving me
- tv miniseries
- you so crazy
- zombiemas 2010
- RT @Super70sSports: The Great Depression in 3-D. Terrific gift for any child. https://t.co/AeAqrznRWw 6 hours ago
Did you know I'm on Instagram? Well, I am.
Top Posts & Pages
- Trembling and Obedient, she Ate that Burning Heart out of his Hand
- Humanoids from the Deep (1980)
- Because He has No Hands?
- Inferno (1980)
- An American Werewolf in London
- Ovine Spongiform Encephal-Apathy
- Sweets to the Sweet
- A Vampire Movie Unlike Any Other
- When Real-Life and Horror Intersect
Top 10 “Scenes That Make You Go ‘What?'”